Renting Vs Buying, And When To Invest... The 1% Rule And #NYC Real Estate
Deciding whether to rent or buy is an age old question, and one that leaves many people confused and misguided. Many people are ill prepared to deal with their emotions about the subject and make decisions with clarity. Financially, it is one of the biggest decisions you can possibly make, so making a purchase decision without some key bedrock financial understanding is akin to going into a gunfight with a water pistol.
When do I rent and when do I buy?
Many people hinge their success in life on owning a home. They are convinced that renting is just "flushing away money" and that home ownership is a right and a privilege that every American deserves. They leverage themselves to the limit, and end up with a 30 year mortgage that, even at today's low interest rates, will have them paying for that house twice over by the end of the term. In NYC, with its high property values, an average middle of the road home can easily go for a cool $1,000,000. By the end of the loan, at 5% interest (if you can even get a loan for that low a rate) you will end up having paid $1,932,588 for said home.
"But I'm building equity, right?" Actually, not as much as you think... Sure, you have the initial 20% down payment that you put into the property to secure the loan, in this case $200,000 (as banks typically want at least 20% plus excellent credit to consider a loan right now) but what happens if you need to sell and the market is down? You have effectively lost equity. Many people who bought at the top of the market in 2007 are now underwater on their loans, they effectively have negative equity. Even if they sell, they will still owe the bank, which leads many of them to be foreclosed upon, walking away from their homes and forfeiting not only their sunk capital but their credit rating. In fact, if you look at and play around with the amortization chart/schedule calculator here, a few things become clear. Firstly, most of the interest is paid in the first half of the loan schedule, in fact, you pay more interest than principle for each payment in the first 193 months of the life of the loan. That means that after paying diligently for more than 16 years you have only paid down about a third of the actual principle balance of the loan. The first year, your payments are comprised of about 83% interest, toward the last year they get as low as 3%.
Now lets look at a rental scenario for a comparable property. Since property values are so high in Manhattan, you can typically rent for about half of what a property would go for should you decide to buy... Using nice round numbers, a $1,000,000 carries a $5000/Month price tag (its actually usually more when you factor in maintenance, insurance, taxes, upkeep etc) when a similar apartment can usually be rented for about $2500 a month, where the landlord pays for maintenance, insurance and taxes. If your dishwasher breaks and you own the place, guess who foots the bill... exactly, it's you. Again, these are rough numbers, you can figure out a more precise scenario for your given situation, this is just to illustrate a point.
Now lets look at two people, Renter Randy and Buyer Betty. They have the same amount of cash and the same income, lets say they are equally qualified to purchase or rent the same properties. Buyer Betty puts down her $200,000 down payment on her $1MM property and pays $5000 a month plus all of the aforementioned extras for her 'owned' apartment, but builds very little equity in 15 years. In that same time, Renter Randy decides to take that $200,000, plus the extra $2500 a month ($30,000 a year) he saves and wait for dips in the market to buy index funds. Even passively purchasing equities at regular intervals, based on the performance history of the S&P 500 and adjusting for inflation, Renter Randy can expect an 8% per year return on his investment over time. We use a savings calculator to and an amortization schedule to figure out where each is at the end of this first 15 years.
Buyer Betty, who started out with a $200K down payment and paid diligently for 15 years, only has built about up to about $456,929 in equity, including her initial down payment, and still has another 180 months (15 years) of payments to go before she pays the remaining balance of the loan ($543,071). During this time, she has paid to maintain and fix up her home, as well as insurance and other extras that come with being a diligent homeowner. Not to mention that she is glued to one place... A renter can pick up and change scenery whenever they feel like. A home can take months if not years to sell, and you lose on commissions, lawyers, and all the hidden extras that come with a home sale.
Renter Randy, however, despite "flushing" his money away on rent, has diligently been investing his initial $200,000, plus the $30,000 per year he has saved by not buying, and spending the extra monies left over-- which were not spent on dishwashers, maintenance, insurance, taxes etc-- on vacations. His annual rate of return has been at least 8% after inflation, and he now has turned his initial $200,000 into a cool $1.3 Million. He can now use this money to buy a place outright, or if he is now in love with renting, as he should be, continue to rent and live off the interest. He now has options, which are much better than obligations.
Now I know what you are thinking, Betty not only built equity, but her property has probably appreciated some too in that same time frame. Perhaps, but as we have seen in the housing crash in 2008, you can't count on appreciation. Its a lazy and dangerous way to invest. A seasoned investor knows that cash flow is king... the only good investment, or true asset, is one that puts money in your pocket. Betting on appreciation is akin to gambling. The debt she secured is also a huge liability.
There are some scenarios when it does make sense to buy instead of rent, but typically home prices in major cities such as New York preclude this from happening. Luckily, after many years of keeping my ear to the ground on real estate as an agent and also an investor, I have learned a very easy rule to quickly determine not only whether it is better to rent or buy in a particular area or market, but whether or not an investment will potentially be cashflow positive, which is what a sophisticated investor should be interested in.
The 1% Rule... A home that you can rent monthly for at least 1% of the purchase price (at current interest rates) will typically be cash flow positive, assuming the maintenance is not extensive.
Now if you apply this to your $1MM home, there is nothing on the market that you can purchase for $1MM and rent for $10,000 per month. A $100,000 home going for $1,000 a month in rent is not unheard of, and in fact is a more common scenario around the country. If you would have to pay $1500 a month to rent a place that costs $100,000 to buy, you are actually saving money by purchasing the home, even when you take interest into account. If you are renting it out, the cash flow would typically be positive. This gives you options.
REO's (Real Estate Owned) are typically very cheap compared to the open market, and hard negotiations coupled with motivated sellers can produce amazingly cheap deals. REO's are simply homes that the bank owns but cannot collect on. They have foreclosed, put it up for auction, but still have no buyers. These homes are essentially toxic assets, they still have to pay for the taxes and other lawful obligations, but are usually not allowed to collect rent, as most places have laws that preclude banks from making money any other way than from lending. A bank does not want to be a landlord anyway, they want to make money by borrowing cheaply and lending money at higher interest rates. What this means for an investor is that you can usually come in with a lowball offer and pick up these toxic assets cheaply, then fix them up and rent or sell them.
If you choose to build a rental portfolio, which in my personal experience is more headache than its worth, you should always be sure that in almost every scenario that you are cash flow positive. You should be consistently clearing at least 8% cash on cash return, and building equity at a favorable rate. There is still a lot of friction in this business model, and high overhead. Bad tenants, bad property managers, maintenance, taxes, insurance, and lawsuits (some are just unavoidable, no matter how good a landlord you are) will all eat into your profit and cause undue stress. Buying established blue chip dividend stocks when they are on sale is my personal preference for excess cash. They are reasonably liquid, and if your timing is good, go on sale much more often than homes. Also, no maintenance, no headaches, and long term capital gains taxes are very low when compared to earned income. You simply have to have an eye for a bargain and keep tabs on your companies performance. Index funds are even less maintenance, you get inflation protection, dividends, and liquidity benefits. Or you can simply build low friction high yield cash flow businesses. Ask me for more info on this.
I understand this is grossly simplified, but I hope this helps at least see the bigger picture. If you have any specific questions please feel free to drop me a note, or better yet, do some of the math and see for yourself. I used the Mortgage Calculator App from SVT software and CreditKarma.com for the mortgage calculations and amortization schedules respectively, and the SaveCalc App (pictured above) for the compound interest calculations.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 11:07AM

